Oswestry disability index pdf download

Golob A, Wipf J Low back pain. Med Clin N Am 98 3 — Article PubMed Google Scholar. Spine 34 19 — Article Google Scholar. Spine 31 23 — Davidson M, Keating JL A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther — Ann Phys Rehabil Med 57 9—10 — Systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther 96 10 — Physiotherapy 66 8 — Spine — Roland M, Morris R A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Spine 8 2 — J Med Assoc Thail 88 3 — Google Scholar. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp — Spine 36 26 :E—E Glob Spine J — Spine 31 14 :E—E Spine 38 4 :E—E Spine 37 7 :E—E The signNow extension gives you a variety of features merging PDFs, including multiple signers, and many others to guarantee a better signing experience. The sigNow extension was developed to help busy people like you to decrease the burden of signing legal forms. The whole procedure can last less than a minute.

As a result, you can download the signed oswestry low back to your device or share it with other parties involved with a link or by email. Due to its cross-platform nature, signNow works on any gadget and any OS.

Select our eSignature tool and say goodbye to the old times with efficiency, affordability and security. The signNow application is equally as efficient and powerful as the web app is.

Connect to a smooth connection to the internet and start completing documents with a fully legitimate electronic signature within minutes. If you want to share the oswestry low back with other parties, you can send it by e-mail. With signNow, you can eSign as many papers per day as you require at a reasonable price. Begin automating your eSignature workflows today. Skip to content. Products Products Get eSignature workflows, document management, and business process automation with the airSlate Business Cloud.

Solutions Keep your business moving forward by automating the most complex eSignature workflows. By use. By industry. By integration. SDKs Node. Free trial. Establishing secure connection… Loading editor… Preparing document….

Get Form. How it works Browse for the disability index form. Customize and eSign oswestry low back. Development of a French-Canadian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.

Ann Readapt Med Phys. French PubMed abstract. Cross-cultural adaptation of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index and evaluation of its measurement properties. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery. European Spine Journal.

Clinical relevance of specific parametersiolate within the greek translation of the Oswestry and Roland-Morris functional disability scales. Clin Orthop. Gujarati: Shah S, Balaganapathy M. Reliability and validity study of the Gujarati version of the Oswestry Disability Index 2. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. Psychometric properties of the Hebrew version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Epub ahead of print PubMed abstract.

Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the oswestry disability index and the Quebec back pain disability scale. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Indonesian version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Discriminative validity and responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index among Japanese outpatients with lumbar conditions.

Validation of the Korean version of the oswestry disability index. Validation in the cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index. J Korean Med Sci. J Patient Rep Outcomes. J Rehabil Med. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Polish version of the Oswestry Disability Index.

Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain. All items focus on functional Content Validity. The range of the score is from 0 to A higher score indicates more functional limitation due to back Construct Validity Convergent and Divergent Validity.

Con- problems. The 8 multi-item subscales contain 2 to 10 items. Lower BP , which measured physical function and pain. In contrast, the ODI point.

The patient was asked to draw a mark at a point that score was expected to be less correlated with the sub- corresponded to the magnitude of their current pain in their scale score of the SF36 RE and MH , which measure low back or leg.

The deleted. Ideally, item- Chinese use a bedpan instead of crawling to the toilet. When any In section 4, in the question about walking, walking single item was deleted, none of them increased more distances described in miles or yards were converted to than 0. Reproducibility Test—Retest Reliability. A measure of Demographic Data and Score Distribution within-subject variation and the limits of agreement The demographic data of those participants in both were examined using the Bland and Altman plot.

Concerning educational The plot shows the difference between the first and the level, most of those in the pretest group were at elemen- second sum scores against the mean of both sum tary school level. In the test—retest group, the low back scores. To assess the systematic bias, a paired t test was pain duration of the participants was at least 3 months. The age, VAS score, and every item is relevant to this population.

For the test—retest reliability, the average time span There were no significant floor 0. Fifty-two patients Furthermore, traveling. The item- indexes. The SEM was 4. The about sleeping to 0. Table 2. Bland-Altman plot for test—retest reliability of the ODI. The plot indicates the differences between measures from the 2 test sessions against the mean of the 2 sessions for each participant. Validity Discussion Table 5 shows the associations between the scores of the The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the ODI and the variables used to examine the construct ODI 2.

The results showed that the Chi- tory convergent validity. The major difference from the showed moderate to high correlation with the ODI original ODI was a question about walking in section score, indicating satisfactory convergent validity. The 2 4. Thus, the Chinese version 2. RMDQ 0. As expected, the Chinese ODI 2. People in Taiwan, when with the other convergent SF measures and the VAS they are unable to walk, usually use a bedpan instead pain score.

These results indicate that the Chinese ODI of crawling to the toilet. Most of them expressed that SF The reason was that the question in section 9 asked rather than their being shy on this issue, there was simply for an assessment of how the back or leg trouble had no sexual partner. Some adolescent patients expressed affected their abilities to participate in a social life.

The that they were too young to have experienced sex. How- moderate correlation with the SF subscale of the SF36 is ever, we did not omit this section so that the equivalence also supported by other studies.

This observation in- dicates that sex life is an important component of the similar result was also found in patients with spinal sur- total score of the ODI 2. The all subscales. Also, the results of item-total score One limitation is the lack of a responsiveness study. The finding of the homoge- naire can detect small but important clinical changes.

The responsiveness information also helps re- of the ODI 2. To determine whether patient low back ses.

A hardly be used to interpret the reliability of the individual third limitation is the generalizability of our findings. However, the MDC is useful to determine whether This study was performed in a small number of pa- the change score is beyond measurement error or is at- tients with nonspecific low back pain from a single tributable to chance variation of measurement in an in- center. Multicenter studies are needed to improve the dividual patient.